University, linguistic and reflection
By: Ricardo Melgarejo House
ant Q comment and add a bit more about the exhibition by Luis Jaime Cisneros about his recent article "University and reflection" (see Hall precarious, Replública [ http:// www.larepublica.pe/aula-precaria/19/07/2009/universidad-y-reflexion ]).
begin ruling that who is appointed or create bear the label of "university" should be aware of the responsibility and implications for the human and scientific development that encourages the academic vein. Therefore, I think as a first point, that being aware of the diverse reality of the country a trigger for decision making, critical thinking, creativity and innovation to move towards what is called "scientific activity" for the postulation of hypotheses for future solutions.
Being obsessed with reality and national problems, and moreover, not direct our professional vocation to these guidelines is the mistake that the college graduate cyclopean can do: it is expected that most end up as a stiff "without knowing how to approach the theory into practice or a more stiff with good theoretical and scientific parallel but without the philosophy or love of wisdom (love of science.)
As a second point as the teacher pointed Cisneros precisely this attitude toward the exogenous material is not taught in the university: it is something that should come from the school and yet, only the university would be responsible for being a grinder to polish our skills and critical attitude to be in the forefront of society and not vice versa. So the implicit rescued Article: know the reality, problems and needs of society does not imply that the subject content of the various university budgets should be subject to the market talk that scientific knowledge must be based on the market working knowledge of the reality and problems is a myth that must be eradicated.
However, such an attitude would result in the eradication of economically less profitable disciplines have, in general, long-term results and some humanities. What
require college?
As individual who tries to be a university student, I note that the claims are in search of what is appropriate for research, laboratory equipment, better libraries, and especially permanent advisory specialist teachers and active in doing research as to serve as motivational paradigms. Logically, the university will use the State for such attainment.
The analogies are obvious from the most clueless. These requirements are comparable with non-higher education.
excessive centralism school needs little or nothing has solved the problem of quality of education. Perhaps the solution is not the sole fact of requiring and require specialized equipment and teachers. Is not taking care of something that is the basis for the formation of the scientific attitude: the text and reading. I'm not going to base on the subject at the moment but I think this aspect is very sloppy.
University and linguistic
lines of the grounds set up the result is unique and many inferences, as I see it. The lack of interest in humanities by low immediacy to the mercantilist needs of society, leads the state to take actions that are clamorous bray that universities sometimes comply. One such
crunch is not to judge the language curriculum as part of elementary education (or higher). How, to quote an example, if the much-vaunted respect for cultural diversity or "multiculturalism" is not involved and the respect of linguistic diversity and language, how, if the study of language as a human product is something synchronous and adopt the as a single language.
that human language is taken over 6700 linguistic systems with a multitude of dialects, and not be aware of the diverse reality leads to a lack of understanding of cultural and social phenomenon. That is, without a study of linguistic phenomena seen as such do not think it possible to meet that respect for others.
education teachers should give ear to the demands required by some linguists, if language skills do not apply to particular cases of languages \u200b\u200bother than the L1, at least see how that language works in deserving cases for analysis.
I believe that not enough synchronic analysis of language-that is, the only sentence analysis to see that performance-apparent, but the pricing trends over time, how is that related or other language systems have left mark as substrates, or adstratum superstrate, ie how they have left an entire cultural worldview to the current language. The same test should be done now looking forward, how the various linguistic codes of youth, which some regard as abhorrent, inconsistent and sometimes incoherent, are contributing to the reorganization, whether grammatical or lexical, the current language. Using a typical
iteration
about other colleagues, I dream that no one thinks that language is useless, and is subject to the mere correction and say and be as good full stop. Although logical, to be important in different management styles and language resources in the most intelligible possible to address different situations or circumstances that society demands, it is.
And so, I think if the university has or is at the forefront of society where the disciplines of reflection on the different level of linguistic and cultural.
College is every guy who says "college" and the university is living in constant reflection and critical debate.
and completing the college ... How to stop being such a rare bird that characterizes a linguist?
The question itself is silly to answer, in part because they must be aware of the fact that the linguistic labor can offer. I do not want to show the applications of linguistics points, but if you mention some basic questions that the "university" should know. How many times maybe our parents, teachers or friends have told us "do you know what you're getting or studying?, What is your race or similar things like that? And the collective likelihood basically reduced to two holdouts: teaching and tasks related to translation and interpretation-not to consider a third and little practiced stronghold: the investigation.
Making a timely digression about it, for not very skilled in the art, linguistics studying the underlying principles of human language. These principles are updated according to rules of speech historically determined by the community (use of "x" code language). Obviously, this would be possible if the language did not have a differentiated by the proactive role, interactivity and dynamism: communication.
human communication is studied, in a primary or not, for various scientific disciplines and who have made it almost impossible to demarcate completely.
For these reasons why we gather linguistics has not yet been able, as all science-establish their own borders. Thus from the fifties more notoriety note its interdisciplinary nature. Another inference
obvious why there is inherently more job opportunities for an applied linguist, one theoretical - "applied" in the sense of what the linguist serves as the theoretical, to (re) build an interdisciplinary way [and for practical purposes] (payrate 1998: 24) -.
The interdisciplinary nature of linguistics or intersect is valid for each branch of a language, why not talk about an applied branch in general, exempt or alleged linguistics traditional. However, as noted above, if the linguistic studies the phenomenon of language as a communication tool, and this is studied by a number of science, the study is based on purely practical purposes: to identify and solve the problems induced by the communication processes own characteristic of modern societies.
However, as point "reduces the likelihood collective pockets basically two: teaching and tasks related to translation and interpretation." Is that only in these domains is believed to be exercised professional linguist and I disagree with some uncertainty, that ordinary people know other applications domains of our profession, for example, summarizing some data from the Book of payrate linguist by profession: a survey of applied linguistics (1998) -:
Or merely linguistic applications domains -If you consider that other people's belief is to see more understood as a mere linguistic grammar, for both their sub-disciplines: phonology, morphology, syntax, semantics, etc. .- but also reduced to remnants school ( teaching) and administrative or business (correction). Well we
the problem of the matter ... How do people no longer see ourselves as a rare avis? And above all ... How can exercise the professional linguist in areas not known? It's very complicated ideologies rooted around our frame work of our profession. However, I must admit that everything evolves, as the Tags is happening copyeditor-some call it now language consultant. This is not free, supports greater involvement of the corrector. Thus, teaching is not exempt from this development, since, in dribs and drabs, the teacher linguist is no longer the ideal of correct individual or which is equipped with a chip policy, for someone to provide an appropriate way, resources needed for learning knowledge and attitudes in support of strengthening the development of optimal communication skills.
does not provide an answer that is the recipe for applicative knowledge of other branches of the branches of linguistics by society, but I think as I have to note, the same requirements of society have led to diversify many of the language sciences of linguistics and that brought the language to extend and complement in an interdisciplinary way with other sciences that require their help to explain certain phenomena. Thus the evolution of language and hopefully continues, however, the results of increased knowledge of linguistics to a long period that does not lose faith that knowing more of the domains and humanistic reality of my career, I get the right to raise. There
the work of the university, as he claims Cisneros: "She [the university] we come to study with the certainty of that knowledge effectively makes us better service the polis. Faith strengthens the study and humanistic accentuates her profile. The more perfect the knowledge, better understanding is the man, our neighbor essential. A more real, more solid knowledge and faith more real. Learning and teaching is a task that calls us the truth. "
Thus, the solution of this ignorance is the one at university teaching (scientific) must provide to society, do not expect it to live in a culture of "should" in which others are expected to solve problems our Especially when the solution is right under our noses: the problem and solution is oneself.
begin ruling that who is appointed or create bear the label of "university" should be aware of the responsibility and implications for the human and scientific development that encourages the academic vein. Therefore, I think as a first point, that being aware of the diverse reality of the country a trigger for decision making, critical thinking, creativity and innovation to move towards what is called "scientific activity" for the postulation of hypotheses for future solutions.
Being obsessed with reality and national problems, and moreover, not direct our professional vocation to these guidelines is the mistake that the college graduate cyclopean can do: it is expected that most end up as a stiff "without knowing how to approach the theory into practice or a more stiff with good theoretical and scientific parallel but without the philosophy or love of wisdom (love of science.)
As a second point as the teacher pointed Cisneros precisely this attitude toward the exogenous material is not taught in the university: it is something that should come from the school and yet, only the university would be responsible for being a grinder to polish our skills and critical attitude to be in the forefront of society and not vice versa. So the implicit rescued Article: know the reality, problems and needs of society does not imply that the subject content of the various university budgets should be subject to the market talk that scientific knowledge must be based on the market working knowledge of the reality and problems is a myth that must be eradicated.
However, such an attitude would result in the eradication of economically less profitable disciplines have, in general, long-term results and some humanities. What
require college?
As individual who tries to be a university student, I note that the claims are in search of what is appropriate for research, laboratory equipment, better libraries, and especially permanent advisory specialist teachers and active in doing research as to serve as motivational paradigms. Logically, the university will use the State for such attainment.
The analogies are obvious from the most clueless. These requirements are comparable with non-higher education.
excessive centralism school needs little or nothing has solved the problem of quality of education. Perhaps the solution is not the sole fact of requiring and require specialized equipment and teachers. Is not taking care of something that is the basis for the formation of the scientific attitude: the text and reading. I'm not going to base on the subject at the moment but I think this aspect is very sloppy.
University and linguistic
lines of the grounds set up the result is unique and many inferences, as I see it. The lack of interest in humanities by low immediacy to the mercantilist needs of society, leads the state to take actions that are clamorous bray that universities sometimes comply. One such
crunch is not to judge the language curriculum as part of elementary education (or higher). How, to quote an example, if the much-vaunted respect for cultural diversity or "multiculturalism" is not involved and the respect of linguistic diversity and language, how, if the study of language as a human product is something synchronous and adopt the as a single language.
that human language is taken over 6700 linguistic systems with a multitude of dialects, and not be aware of the diverse reality leads to a lack of understanding of cultural and social phenomenon. That is, without a study of linguistic phenomena seen as such do not think it possible to meet that respect for others.
education teachers should give ear to the demands required by some linguists, if language skills do not apply to particular cases of languages \u200b\u200bother than the L1, at least see how that language works in deserving cases for analysis.
I believe that not enough synchronic analysis of language-that is, the only sentence analysis to see that performance-apparent, but the pricing trends over time, how is that related or other language systems have left mark as substrates, or adstratum superstrate, ie how they have left an entire cultural worldview to the current language. The same test should be done now looking forward, how the various linguistic codes of youth, which some regard as abhorrent, inconsistent and sometimes incoherent, are contributing to the reorganization, whether grammatical or lexical, the current language. Using a typical
iteration
about other colleagues, I dream that no one thinks that language is useless, and is subject to the mere correction and say and be as good full stop. Although logical, to be important in different management styles and language resources in the most intelligible possible to address different situations or circumstances that society demands, it is.
And so, I think if the university has or is at the forefront of society where the disciplines of reflection on the different level of linguistic and cultural.
College is every guy who says "college" and the university is living in constant reflection and critical debate.
and completing the college ... How to stop being such a rare bird that characterizes a linguist?
The question itself is silly to answer, in part because they must be aware of the fact that the linguistic labor can offer. I do not want to show the applications of linguistics points, but if you mention some basic questions that the "university" should know. How many times maybe our parents, teachers or friends have told us "do you know what you're getting or studying?, What is your race or similar things like that? And the collective likelihood basically reduced to two holdouts: teaching and tasks related to translation and interpretation-not to consider a third and little practiced stronghold: the investigation.
Making a timely digression about it, for not very skilled in the art, linguistics studying the underlying principles of human language. These principles are updated according to rules of speech historically determined by the community (use of "x" code language). Obviously, this would be possible if the language did not have a differentiated by the proactive role, interactivity and dynamism: communication.
human communication is studied, in a primary or not, for various scientific disciplines and who have made it almost impossible to demarcate completely.
For these reasons why we gather linguistics has not yet been able, as all science-establish their own borders. Thus from the fifties more notoriety note its interdisciplinary nature. Another inference
obvious why there is inherently more job opportunities for an applied linguist, one theoretical - "applied" in the sense of what the linguist serves as the theoretical, to (re) build an interdisciplinary way [and for practical purposes] (payrate 1998: 24) -.
The interdisciplinary nature of linguistics or intersect is valid for each branch of a language, why not talk about an applied branch in general, exempt or alleged linguistics traditional. However, as noted above, if the linguistic studies the phenomenon of language as a communication tool, and this is studied by a number of science, the study is based on purely practical purposes: to identify and solve the problems induced by the communication processes own characteristic of modern societies.
However, as point "reduces the likelihood collective pockets basically two: teaching and tasks related to translation and interpretation." Is that only in these domains is believed to be exercised professional linguist and I disagree with some uncertainty, that ordinary people know other applications domains of our profession, for example, summarizing some data from the Book of payrate linguist by profession: a survey of applied linguistics (1998) -:
- The tasks of lexicography .
- The tasks of teaching the mother tongue [strengthening and supplementation] and languages \u200b\u200b[second language].
- The tasks of the translation.
- The tasks of automatic processing of texts.
- The tasks of the terminology.
- The tasks of the documentation.
- The tasks of language planning [for maintenance or replacement].
- The tasks of the treatment of communication disorders.
- The tasks of publishing [grammar and style]. The tasks of the media.
- The tasks of language services companies and government [linguistic consultant].
Or merely linguistic applications domains -If you consider that other people's belief is to see more understood as a mere linguistic grammar, for both their sub-disciplines: phonology, morphology, syntax, semantics, etc. .- but also reduced to remnants school ( teaching) and administrative or business (correction). Well we
the problem of the matter ... How do people no longer see ourselves as a rare avis? And above all ... How can exercise the professional linguist in areas not known? It's very complicated ideologies rooted around our frame work of our profession. However, I must admit that everything evolves, as the Tags is happening copyeditor-some call it now language consultant. This is not free, supports greater involvement of the corrector. Thus, teaching is not exempt from this development, since, in dribs and drabs, the teacher linguist is no longer the ideal of correct individual or which is equipped with a chip policy, for someone to provide an appropriate way, resources needed for learning knowledge and attitudes in support of strengthening the development of optimal communication skills.
does not provide an answer that is the recipe for applicative knowledge of other branches of the branches of linguistics by society, but I think as I have to note, the same requirements of society have led to diversify many of the language sciences of linguistics and that brought the language to extend and complement in an interdisciplinary way with other sciences that require their help to explain certain phenomena. Thus the evolution of language and hopefully continues, however, the results of increased knowledge of linguistics to a long period that does not lose faith that knowing more of the domains and humanistic reality of my career, I get the right to raise. There
the work of the university, as he claims Cisneros: "She [the university] we come to study with the certainty of that knowledge effectively makes us better service the polis. Faith strengthens the study and humanistic accentuates her profile. The more perfect the knowledge, better understanding is the man, our neighbor essential. A more real, more solid knowledge and faith more real. Learning and teaching is a task that calls us the truth. "
Thus, the solution of this ignorance is the one at university teaching (scientific) must provide to society, do not expect it to live in a culture of "should" in which others are expected to solve problems our Especially when the solution is right under our noses: the problem and solution is oneself.
0 comments:
Post a Comment